Razer Seiren vs Blue Yeti microphones technical comparison

Both producers have a number of variations of those two USB microphones for streaming with slight variations (though the specs are the identical and solely the equipment included or some functionalities differ), so we’re going to take the Razer Seiren X mannequin and the Blue Microphones mannequin as a reference. Yeti (the “customary”). In phrases of value, the Blue Yeti is barely dearer, even when we use its “Nano” model within the comparison (actually, the Seiren X in white prices € 10 lower than the traditional black).

In any case, each are in the identical value vary, for the reason that distinction is roughly 10%, so which of the 2 is extra value shopping for?

Razer Seiren vs Blue Yeti, technical traits

Razer Seiren X Blue yeti
Pattern Supercardioid Cardioid, Bidirectional, Omnidirectional, Stereo
Type Condenser (25mm) Condenser (3x14mm)
Interface USB USB
Sampling charge 44.1-48 OkHz 48 okHz
Frequency response 20 Hz – 20 OkHz 20 Hz – 20 OkHz
Sensitivity 17.eight mV / Pa (at 1 okHz)
Sound strain 110 dB (THD 120dB (THD: 0.5% 1kHz)
Headphone amplifier Yes Yes
equipment Support (base)
Screw anchor
Support (base)
Screw anchor
PVP 109.99 € 139.99 €

The first elementary distinction we discovered between these two microphones is that the Seiren X has a supercardioid pickup sample, which whereas perfect for streaming as a result of it eliminates among the background noise, is restricted to only that. For its half, the Blue Yeti means that you can select the pickup sample between cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional and stereo, making it extra versatile.

The Razer Seiren X has a 25mm condenser microphone, whereas the Blue Yeti integrates three smaller, 14mm condensers. What is healthier between these two choices? In phrases of high quality, the Seiren will win by having a a lot bigger diameter, whereas the Yeti is once more extra versatile, since this design means that you can merely change between pickup patterns.

Razer seiren elite

Regarding the technical traits, each microphones are fairly related, with a frequency response of 20 Hz to 20 OkHz, though the Blue Yeti has a greater sound strain pick-up, 10 dB larger than the Seiren and that signifies that it will likely be able to higher seize sounds distant from the microphone. Finally, each gadgets have direct USB connectivity to the PC, so they don’t want a preamp with an XLR connector to work (and on the identical time they work fully digitally), they usually incorporate virtually the identical equipment, that are nothing greater than a base to place them on the desk and a normal thread for tripods or swing arms.

Which microphone is finest for streaming?

Both microphones are a superb possibility for customers who wish to begin on the earth of streaming, and wish to do it with a minimal of high quality however with out spending the cash {that a} skilled system requires. The high quality of each gadgets is unquestionable, and it’s merely value mentioning that the Seiren could possibly decide up a extra pure tone of voice than the Yeti, because it has a bigger diameter condenser. On the opposite, the Yeti has the benefit that it’s far more versatile by permitting us to pick which sample we wish to use at any given time.

Actually, if we had to decide on one of many two fashions we’d inform you to purchase the one which was on sale at that second, as a result of each are equally glorious at a non-professional stage. Depending on the use that you’re going to give it, it might price you extra to purchase the Seiren in case you are solely going to stream video video games, whereas for those who intend to make a extra versatile use of the microphone, then the Blue Yeti will likely be a greater possibility.