The definitive battery test: iPhone 12 vs iPhone 13

iphone 12 and iphone 13 battery

Many objections are usually made to the autonomy of the iPhone and it is that in recent years it was not exactly the strong point of Apple smartphones. Now, what about the battery of the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13? Are there many differences? We have made an exhaustive comparison with which we have drawn more than interesting conclusions.

Technical data of the batteries

Definitely, data such as the capacity of the batteries, the autonomy that they mark on paper or the charging method are not one hundred percent determining aspects. However, it does not hurt to know these data to get a global idea of ​​what these two iPhones offer us here.

What capabilities do they have?

Go ahead that Apple has never offered official data on the capacity of the batteries of the iPhone 12 and 13. In fact, it never does. The reason for this gives for another interesting debate, but for the question that concerns us here you should know that the data has been obtained based on tests carried out by professionals and through accurate tools when deciphering the battery capacities, giving these results :

  • iPhone 12: 2,775mAh
  • iPhone 13: 3,227mAh

At first we already observe a 452mAh difference Although it is not much, it is more than appreciable. It should be noted that the body of the devices is similar, but the ’13’ increased its thickness a bit precisely so that a larger battery could be added. Of course, it goes without saying that cannot be increased capacity or at least not in a ‘legal’ way. In an unauthorized establishment or on your own you can put older batteries, but in addition to losing the guarantee, they will not be original parts and the operation may not be adequate. In fact, if the capacity is much higher, it could directly affect the performance of the iPhone.

charging times

Although this is a factor that should not affect the battery life itself, it is no less important. After all, it is interesting to always know how long it will take for the phone to fully charge when the battery runs out. Both iPhone 12 and iPhone 13 share specifications in this area, also having the possibility of charging both via Lightning cable or wireless charging (Qi standard). They are even compatible with MagSafe magnetic chargers.

That said, the times that Apple itself sets for charging are 0 to 100% in 30 minutes. But this indicative is “cheating” and it is that for this you need an adapter of 20 W or higher, which is not included in the box. And we say 20 W because, although higher power can be used, both devices have fast charging limited at that power.

The other “trap” that the data has is that, at first, you can think that from 50% to 100% it will also take half an hour. But no, it’s not like that. This second section of charging is slower due to how the charging system of these iPhones is configured, which tries to prevent the battery from overheating and therefore from greater wear. The actual time it would take to charge one of these devices from 0 to 100% would be between 1 hour and a half-2 hours.

MagSafe imitation

Autonomy according to Apple

Apple gives a series of indicative autonomy times that must be analyzed in their context. And it is that in the end they have been measured in a very specific way, making a single use of the terminals and in an uninterrupted way, something that a normal user would rarely (if ever) do. In any case, it is still interesting to observe it to see what differences the brand itself says they have.

  • In video playback (online):
    • iPhone 12: up to 11 hours
    • iPhone 13: up to 15 hours
  • In video playback (offline):
    • iPhone 12: up to 17 hours
    • iPhone 13: up to 19 hours
  • In audio playback:
    • iPhone 12: up to 65 hours
    • iPhone 13: up to 75 hours

As you will see, these are more than considerable differences because, except for local video playback (2 hours), the differences are between 4 and up to 10 hours. The iPhone 13 performs better, there is no doubt and it was even expected. In the following sections we will see to what extent these theoretical data are transferred to real life.

user experience

Now yes, we fully enter the comparison that we have made in real environments. For this we will tell you that both devices were with the same configuration and with 100% battery health. The latter is important when it comes to understanding that in the end this measurement could change over time due to the obvious and natural deterioration of the batteries.

With moderate use

This is the one that we have considered as a more daily use and that is more adjusted to the average user. We made use of high-consumption processes at certain times, but we focused mainly on those more routine actions, having this percentage of use.

  • Social networks (Instagram, TikTok, Twitter, etc.): 24%
  • streaming video (Apple TV+, Netflix, YouTube, etc.): 22%
  • messaging apps (Telegram, WhatsApp, etc.): 17%
  • Video call (FaceTime, Skype, etc.): 10%
  • gps (Apple Maps, Google Maps, Waze, etc.): 7%
  • Navigation (Safari): 7%
  • podcast (Apple Podcast, Overcast, etc.): 6%
  • Camera (photo and video): 3%
  • Telephone (voice calls): 3%
  • Email (Mail, Spark, etc.): 1%
  • Use of WiFi vs Mobile Data: 80% – 20%

iphone 12

The results What we got were the following:

  • iPhone 12: 14 hours and a half (from 7:30 to 22:04)
  • iPhone 13: 4:00 p.m. (7:30 a.m. to 11:39 p.m.)

Intensive and demanding use

For this test, we decided to choose to demand the iPhone 12 and 13 to the fullest, taking the opportunity to make not only intensive use, but also demanding. For this, we try to give the most screen time to those actions that usually generate the most battery consumption on any mobile device (including a greater use of mobile data).

  • Video game: 29%
  • Camera (photo and video): 18%
  • streaming video (Apple TV+, Netflix, YouTube, etc.): 16%
  • Video call (FaceTime, Skype, etc.): 12%
  • Navigation (Safari): 9%
  • gps (Apple Maps, Google Maps, Waze, etc.): 7%
  • podcast (Apple Podcast, Overcast, etc.): 3%
  • Telephone (voice calls): 2%
  • messaging apps (Telegram, WhatsApp, etc.): 2%
  • Social networks (Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, etc.): 1%
  • Email (Mail, Spark, etc.): 1%
  • Use of WiFi vs Mobile Data: 65% – 35%

iPhone 13 Cases

In this type of use, results obtained were these:

  • iPhone 12: 8 hours (from 7:00 to 15:12)
  • iPhone 13: 10 hours and a half (from 7:00 to 17:24)

Conclusions of the comparison

If something has become clear to us after the comparison, it is that there is a real difference of 1 hour and a half between both devices. Concluding if it is a big or small difference is already a matter of each one and what they need from a mobile device. What is clear is that in demanding uses they fall very short and at noon you have to resort to charging it, winning whole in this section the ‘Pro Max’ models (the ‘Pro’ to dry have less autonomy, although on paper it is similar).

In normal use we have to say that they did not disappoint us, but it is not that they are to shoot rockets. None of them reached the full end of the day that we planned for 0:00. And yes, that is something to highlight negatively, although luckily it was at times when it is usually more common to have retired to rest and therefore have the possibility of charging them.

If you are hesitating between buying one and the other, obviously there are many other sections to highlight to decide. However, if the battery is one of the keys, tell you that you will notice a visible improvement with the iPhone 13, but not in an insane way to completely rule out the iPhone 12, since that hour and a half can be very relative.